Another great day of painting with Plein Air group “Painting Buds”!
Hunter Farm, Weddington, NC
Posted in Art, My art, plein air | Tagged Alla Parsons, Art, artist, french easel, hunter farm, landscape, nature, North Carolina, oil, paint out, paint outside, painting, plein air, Plein Air Buds | Leave a Comment »
Today I was lucky enough to paint with a group of Charlotte artists Plein Air Buds. I hope to continue painting with this group as much as I can! It was a wonderful day. The Duke Mansion was in the process of being redecorated, it was interesting to watch. Not much painting was done since I just met many people for the first time and there were conversations and introductions. Hope to be more accomplished the next time I go to paint outside!
I started with a small sketch (above) and then a bigger sketch (below). Scratched out the trees that were light on a dark background with the intention to “finish later”. I have a pile of such “finish later” paintings at home…
It is not the result that matters! It’s the process! Like and share if you agree 🙂
This article just appeared on Artsy.net and I would like to share. It is an interesting collection of facts, including a note by John Baldessari that “conceptual art wasn’t about art that had a concept, but about interrogating the concept of art”. Apparently that is what J.B. does himself – interrogates the concept of art. Here is the article link: If-you-don-t-understand-conceptual-art-it-s-not-your-fault.
Isaac Kaplan is the author of this article. I do not quite understand why he says: “Conceptual art—…—emerged in the 1960s as a reaction to Clement Greenberg’s militant commitment to formalism”. In my opinion, Conceptual art emerged with Marcel Duchamp’s concepts and ideas and his urinal “The Fountain” in 1917. Not necessarily my favorite type of art, but I just like more certainty with dates and facts, probably the result of my first career path in history.
I am personally bored when I see that type of art in museums… But, anyway, it is worth putting a bookmark on this article and reading it later, especially if you are trying to figure out what is wrong with our Art World.
Posted in Alla Parsons Art Criticism, Art World, Uncategorized | Tagged art concepts, Art World, clement greenberg, conceptual art, contemporary art, искусство, formalism, fountain, isaac kaplan, John baldessari, marcel duchamp, modern art, urinal | 1 Comment »
It’s always great to meet and get to know new artists, especially if their art is interesting to you! Here is the link to his website: http://www.vodlanstudios.com
A very interesting and versatile artist, he had an Open Studio today. Originally from Slovenia, he moved to USA … a long time ago… First to New York, but now he lives in Waxhaw, NC. It was a wonderful studio visit, great and inspiring art! Thank you, Joseph for inviting into your space!
When I was in grad school I had to study my own art and artistic process and write a thesis about it. It was then that I discovered the niche where my art belongs in the Art World – a style called Magic Realism.
The term “Magic Realism” was first used by Franz Roh in his book, Nach-expressionismus (Post-Expressionism) written in 1925. He later used the same term in 1968 in his new book German Art in the 20th Century. He also called this new development in art “The New Objectivity” (F. Roh, German Art in the 20th Century. Greenwich: New York Graphic Society, 1968, 112.) By using the term Magic Realism Roh is referring to Post-Expressionistic artwork in which some mystery or secret seems to be hidden within the subject matter. As opposed to Expressionism, “Magic Realism emphasizes the object and the everyday life in new and unfamiliar ways. Juxtapositions of sharply rendered and detailed elements, both in the foreground and back ground, are used to develop an air of mystery or ambiguity. They remind us that there are still many mysteries in life.” http://www.tendreams.org/magic-art.htm
Roh used the following dichotomies to highlight the differences between Expressionism and Magic Realism:
Thick color texture
Emphasis on the visibility of the
Close and far view
Thin paint surface
Effacement of the
External purification of the object
I found more similarities with my artwork among the attributes of Magic Realism than Expressionism. I believe that my style developed more towards representational, quiet, static images in painting, turning daily life into eerie form, with a thin paint surface, although I experimented with the opposite qualities as well, never finding much satisfaction in them. Some of my works are more surrealistic (Caged and If I Could Have Opened My Heart), while others (In the Room With Memories or In the Room With the Magic Ball) can be referred to as Magic Realism.
In Art History, Magic Realism acted as a portal to Surrealism, and many artists shifted back and forth from one to another, especially Magritte (Roch, 138). When I discovered the website ww.tendreams.org I found a few artists there who I knew before and considered them as influences, but did not realize that they belonged to the Magic Realism group, among them Andrew Wyeth, George Tooker and Charles Scheeler. These artists sometimes crossed the boundaries between Surrealism, Symbolism and Magic Realism. My work also shifts back and forth across the boundaries of Surrealism and Magic Realism, while a large number of other works as you can see on my website www.allaparsons.com are just studies from life: Figure, Still Life and Landscape. I feel the need to work on these Life Studies and I am constantly working to improve my skills in observational drawing and painting. However I consider Magic Realism my major work which takes a longer time to go through the process in my mind, before ripening and appearing, first on sketchbook pages and then on canvas.
Posted in Alla Parsons Art Criticism, Art, Art World, My art, Uncategorized | Tagged Alla Parsons, andrew wyeth, Art, art concepts, art programs, Charles Scheeler, contemporary art, алла парсонс, живопись, искусство, fine art, George Tooker, Magic Realism, painting, surrealism | Leave a Comment »
“There is only art. Every single human being is born containing an artist, and this being invents art for itself at around the age of three when, without any teaching or coaching or indoctrination, it invents shape.”
He believed firmly that training in “so-called commercial art” is superior to university art schools because students develop skills that allow them to survive in the world, to understand how the art world operates, and to handle the financial end of working as an artist. “Fine art is a war,” he said. “I hate fine art with all its fuss and crap. Fine art students are brought up in a spirit of contempt for people. Of course I paint for the market. So did Rembrandt. So did Titian. It’s high time we quit compartmentalizing art, and leave graduating students thinking they need a grant to make a living.”
He taught his students, “You have a right to make money out of art. To make money out of art, you have to create art which someone wants to buy. It’s okay if your drawing is crude. That’s how nature meant it to be. The question is how do you turn crude into a marketable commodity.”
This is something that I would say to my students too. I wanted to share this with you. See the entire article at: http://www.historylink.org
Posted in Alla Parsons Art Criticism, Uncategorized | Tagged Alla Parsons, art as commodity, art concepts, art criticism, art for sale, art market, bill cumming, commercial art, contemporary art, алла парсонс, fine art, fine art is war, how to sell art, make money of art, oil on canvas, oil painting, sell art, william cumming | Leave a Comment »